How Did GMOs Get Into Our Food?

By Zuri Star


The best way to answer this is by explaining what substantial equivalence means in relation to genetically engineered organisms (GMOs).

If you are familiar with GMOs but not the term “substantial equivalence,” this quick overview should give insight about how these experimental bioengineered crops ended up growing on roughly 172 million acres of US farmland, and how they do not have to be labeled when they show up in our food supply.

Substantial equivalence in this case means that if a GMO crop contains comparable amounts of a few basic components, such as proteins, fats, and carbohydrates, as its non-GMO counterpart, then the GMO crop is substantially equivalent to the non-GMO. Under this paradigm, GMOs and non-GMOs are the same; therefore, no compulsory safety testing is required by the regulatory agencies. Even though GMOs are made in a lab using biotechnology, substantial equivalence states that they are considered to be equal to a traditional crop produced by farmers. 

The American Substantially Equivalent Policy on GMOs originated in the 1980s. At the time, health and environmental safety testing were problematic for Monsanto and millions of dollars were being spent on GMO technology, which had not received clearance from the USDA. Luckily for Monsanto, the Reagan Administration was in the “deregulation business,” and helped speed up the approval process.

Vice President Bush’s tour of Monsanto’s biotechnology facility in 1987 proved to be a part of the scheme to keep GMOs unregulated. Later during George H. W. Bush’s presidency, Vice President Dan Quayle, announced the substantial equivalence policy in his speech dubbing it the Regulatory Relief Initiative. Coverage of Bush’s visit to Monsanto’s facilities and Dan Quayle’s announcement were captured in the movie, “The World According to Monsanto.” View the short clip of the “dereg business” Bush was responsible for here.

Michael Taylor, a former Monsanto lawyer hired in the Bush era, crafted this brilliantly one-sided policy. The revolving door for Monsanto continued turning when President Obama appointed Taylor the Deputy Commissioner of Foods in 2009. Taylor currently oversees all food safety policy for the federal government and continues to keep GMOs from rigorous independent scientific testing and off of U.S. consumer food labels. GMO labeling pioneer and ally, Food Democracy Now!, captured Obama’s 2007 campaign promise “to label GMO foods upon becoming president” here. Unfortunately that campaign promise was in conflict with the substantially equivalent policy already in place once Obama was elected.

15 Things You Should Know About Monsanto

Outside the U.S., there is wide agreement that GMO foods are different from conventionally bred foods, and that all genetically engineered foods are required to go through safety assessments, prior to approval for commercial use. This agreement was established by the Codex Alimenatarius Commission, an international organization jointly established by the UN Food and Agriculture Organization and the World Health Organization, to set worldwide food safety standards.

At present, none of the genetically engineered plants on sale in America meet this global standard. Unlike almost all other developed countries, the U.S. does not require safety testing of genetically engineered crops. Essentially, the rest of the world uses the precautionary principle with GMOs, while we enjoy (or rather suffer from) our junk food wearing substantially equivalent blindfolds. 


Why are GMOs regulated as being “substantially equivalent” but patented because they are “uniquely” different?

Here is where it gets awfully confusing! See, genetically engineered seeds are patented and cannot be grown without the strict contractual agreements with the makers of that seed, nor are they allowed to be tested by independent parties.

These genetically engineered seeds are patented because they have traits that make them unique from their natural counterparts. These traits are so unique that Monsanto sues farmers for infringing on patent rights, yet so similar that the FDA deems them substantially equivalent to their natural non-GMO, non-patented counterpart. Therefore, these GMO commodity crops used in over 80% of U.S. processed foods are unlabeled and untested. This happens simply because of the deregulation process, led by an administration with direct and continued ties to biotech.

In other words, Monsanto bypasses unwanted regulations by pulling the substantial equivalence card, and pulls the patent seed card to keep anyone from using their product, without paying! Monsanto chooses whatever is the most convenient at any particular time, and for any particular purpose. Essentially then, substantial equivalence (deemed to be regulatorily the same) applies to consumers, whereas seed patents (uniquely different according to the Supreme Court) apply to competitors and customers.

In reviewing Monsanto’s track record since the introduction of genetically modified crops into the food chain in 1997, Monsanto has filed 145 lawsuits against farmers. On average, that is about one lawsuit every three weeks, for 16 straight years. Of those lawsuits, Monsanto has won every single battle.

How Can We Avoid GMOs?

In the U.S., the Grocery Manufactures Association and the big six biotech companies, including Monsanto, have spent millions of dollars fighting GMO labeling laws, even though polls show that over 89% of Americans want to know what they are eating.

In over 60 countries, GMOs are labeled thanks to the Codex Alimentarius Commission agreement. This agreement allows countries to adopt GMO labeling without fear of a legal challenge in the World Trade Organization. Currently, the only way to opt out of the U.S. food experiment is to eat certified organic food, which is labeled and does not allow GMO seeds to be used in production. This sounds simple enough for those of us living in bountiful fresh food regions; however, many consumers are living in food deserts and are subjected to high amounts of processed foods.

Read More: Top 10 Reasons to Avoid GMOs

Many predict, as GMOs become more readily known through successful labeling laws like the one passed in Vermont to go into effect July 1, 2016, that we can expect the demand for non-GMO to shift, just as it did in the European Union. It simply should come down to consumer choice, but for the past 20 years Americans have been kept in the dark by a substantially equivalent law that has benefited only those profiting from these crops.

In researching substantial equivalence you can see where we went wrong, and by knowing that we can steady the ship and change our course of action. As George Santayana said, “Those who are unaware of history are destined to repeat it.” Let us create a new agreement about GMOs, one that supports consumers’ right to know, future generations, human health, animal welfare, food security, sustainability, and farmers.


By Zuri Star| May 17, 2016
Categories:  Live

About the Author

Zuri Star

Zuri Star

Zuri Star is a writer and contributor to Naturally Savvy.  Zuri is also a Singer Songwriter, Entrepreneur and Social Media Maven focused on social media activism within the good food and clean living movements. Zuri assists organizations, influencers, celebrities and brands with new media marketing, brand management, content creation, social strategies, tribe building, non-profit solutions and more. This year Zuri has expanded her entrepreneurial sights on a new omni-media lifestyle company, I Am Zuri, incorporating all of Zuri’s passions and pursuits. You can visit her at www.iamzuri.com.


Add A Comment

Comment

Allowed HTML: <b>, <i>, <u>

Comments


What's Fresh

FacebookTwitterGplusPinterestYoutubeRss




 

RSS

In the Spotlight

  • Bio-K +

    Recommended by health professionals & trusted by consumers looking for real results. There are 50 billion live & active reasons inside Bio-K+. Guaranteed potent & fresh, Bio-K+ delivers.


  • Ellyndale

    Eating healthy while on the go just got easier & more flavorful! Q Cups™ combine organic quinoa with delicious natural flavors for a savory snack that’s ready in just 5 minutes!


  • San-J

    Making premium Tamari and quality Asian cooking sauces since 1804. Now gluten free and non-GMO verified, there is something right for every meal.





Copyright © Agility Inc. 2017